On the other hand, the Nebraska Court of Appeals recently ruled in Shuck v. Shuck. The Court reversed the application of a discount for built-in capital gains tax liability by a court-appointed expert. The Court reasoned that such a discount is relevant under only the following two circumstances:
- The sale of the marital business is reasonably certain to occur in the near future.
- The sale of the marital business is necessary in order to satisfy a spouse's obligations upon divorce.
There is one area where I believe a tax discount for divorce valuations is appropriate. For cash basis taxpayers, I think it is reasonable to apply a discount for income taxes against the collectible value of trade accounts receivable. I justify this position because the earnings process is complete, the cash will be collected in the near future, the prevailing tax rates can be estimated reliably, and the taxes will be due in the foreseeable future. Let me know if you agree or disagree and why. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment